data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b039/1b039fc03861cf8bba54bcc32c128b1735531c07" alt=""
We already had a large antenna in the attic (I am too wary of lightning to put it above the house), and we had been receiving about ten analog channels with it. When we ran a scan, we found we could get nine digital signals, and most of them had subchannels. And we still had the same collection of analog channels. However, several of the digital channels were marginal, and would cut in and out, particularly on a rainy day.
I'd installed twin-lead between the antenna and TV originally, with a 300-to-75 ohm converter, but I read that twin-lead loses a lot of signal. I bought a length of coaxial cable to replace it, and the signals came in much better. No impedance matching needed, either. After a few months I added a preamplifier at the antenna to boost the signal by a factor of ten. Since that time, things have been pretty good.
The image above shows the signal meter that my TV can display. After the DTV transition last Friday, I went through all the digital channels and recorded their strength. I did this a few times. Strangely, some DTV channels that we received just fine before were not found at all when we re-scanned. At the moment we have seven channels, and most of them have sub-channels. This table shows them, with number of subchannels in parentheses, and the range of signal strength (on a logarithmic scale, I assume):
- 03 (1) - 85 to 92
- 06 (3) - 53 to 58
- 12 (3) - 100
- 17 (2) - 61 to 70
- 23 (3) - 45 to 48
- 48 (5) - 23 to 32
- 57 (1) - 40 to 50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6fe8/e6fe8e99a65374f6d0706409c7133795c1302f1d" alt=""
This image was taken at an angle of 34°. I used an image editing program to rotate it back to horizontal, and cropped it. Since I've reduced both images to about 700x400 (you can click on them to see that size), I had pixels to waste. This image is much smoother, with hardly any aliasing visible.
No comments:
Post a Comment